I just recently learned youtube's new system of adding codes into the video's tags to change the quality/aspect ratio. There is also a new code called yt:crop=16:9 that supposedly zooms in on the 16:9 video, and crops out any black bars around the borders of the video. However, I entered the code and to no avail. Here is a video I added the code with http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptG3KrAhu8U If you click %26quot;more info%26quot; for the video description you will see the last tag in the tags list is the code %26quot;yt:crop=16:9%26quot;How Come My Youtube Tag To Crop My 16:9 Videos (yt:crop=16:9) doesn't work?This tag shud remove the black borders:-
yt:stretch=16:9
Also you may add the below tag for your video to be played in HQ by default
yt:quality=highHow Come My Youtube Tag To Crop My 16:9 Videos (yt:crop=16:9) doesn't work?Your video looks 16:9 on my screen. I've never heard of the 16:9 tag before, only the HQ one
Wednesday, September 14, 2011
How to change the game display resolution in Acer laptop?
Hi,
i have acer 5738G laptop, i am facing some problem while i play games.i have 15.4 inches screen with 16:9 aspect ratio, when i play games, the games are not coming full screen, black screen comes beside the left and right of games screen.it appears to all the games. i don't no what exactly do i have to do to get the full display.. can anybody tell the solution for the problem.How to change the game display resolution in Acer laptop?This all depends on the game itself. Why, you ask? Well, if a game was designed for a standard 4:3 ratio, and you force it into a 16:9 ratio, it will cause all the characters to look fat and short... it will distort the dimensions and the way the game looks... and lets face it, game designers spend more than half the time of designing the game, on making it look a VERY specific way. Think about that.
So, if the game designers decided that a game should allow for letterboxing, or a 16:9 display ratio, then it would be in the video settings of the game. That is the first place you should look. There is no way to make the Acer FORCE every game to spread out across the screen.
end of line
i have acer 5738G laptop, i am facing some problem while i play games.i have 15.4 inches screen with 16:9 aspect ratio, when i play games, the games are not coming full screen, black screen comes beside the left and right of games screen.it appears to all the games. i don't no what exactly do i have to do to get the full display.. can anybody tell the solution for the problem.How to change the game display resolution in Acer laptop?This all depends on the game itself. Why, you ask? Well, if a game was designed for a standard 4:3 ratio, and you force it into a 16:9 ratio, it will cause all the characters to look fat and short... it will distort the dimensions and the way the game looks... and lets face it, game designers spend more than half the time of designing the game, on making it look a VERY specific way. Think about that.
So, if the game designers decided that a game should allow for letterboxing, or a 16:9 display ratio, then it would be in the video settings of the game. That is the first place you should look. There is no way to make the Acer FORCE every game to spread out across the screen.
end of line
How do I change my widescreen computer screen from stretching everything?
I got a computer with a widescreen for christmas, and it stretches everything... words, pictures, icons, etc. How would I fix this? I went to the options and brought up a screen that adjusted resolution, but idk where to go from there.
It's an e-machine with an 18.5'' screen, 1366x768 resolution, and an 16:9 aspect ratio
Thank you if you can help!
=]How do I change my widescreen computer screen from stretching everything?Have you tried all the resolutions? Also try actually adjusting the monitor via using the buttons on it, not on the CPU itself. Good Luck!How do I change my widescreen computer screen from stretching everything?you need to increase your screen resolution to something higher than what it's at. If it won't go higher then you need a better video card. To check resolution on vista 64-bit. Right click a blank portion of your desktop. Then click personalize then display settings and the monitor tab. Good luck hope this helps.How do I change my widescreen computer screen from stretching everything?r/c desk top using xp
select properties
select the setting tab ...far right
slide slider to far right (1440 x 900)
r/c desk top
select personalize
select display settings
slide slider to far right (1440 x 900)How do I change my widescreen computer screen from stretching everything?Don't know your monitor but just keep looking in the display properties and/or the monitor buttons itself may be able to change it?
It's an e-machine with an 18.5'' screen, 1366x768 resolution, and an 16:9 aspect ratio
Thank you if you can help!
=]How do I change my widescreen computer screen from stretching everything?Have you tried all the resolutions? Also try actually adjusting the monitor via using the buttons on it, not on the CPU itself. Good Luck!How do I change my widescreen computer screen from stretching everything?you need to increase your screen resolution to something higher than what it's at. If it won't go higher then you need a better video card. To check resolution on vista 64-bit. Right click a blank portion of your desktop. Then click personalize then display settings and the monitor tab. Good luck hope this helps.How do I change my widescreen computer screen from stretching everything?r/c desk top using xp
select properties
select the setting tab ...far right
slide slider to far right (1440 x 900)
r/c desk top
select personalize
select display settings
slide slider to far right (1440 x 900)How do I change my widescreen computer screen from stretching everything?Don't know your monitor but just keep looking in the display properties and/or the monitor buttons itself may be able to change it?
How do I alter the aspect ratio of my video file so that it plays full size on my TV using Ulead Videostudio?
I have a Panasonic SD1 camera. The video files are AVCHD 720x526. When I play them on my widescreen panasonic TV they have black bands above and below. I have tried loading the file into Ulead Videostudio 11 and outputing the file in a 640x480 format. (I have noticed video podcasts play fully on the tv using this ratio or using 720x480). However, outputing these aspect ratios still leaves the black bands above and below the video. I know that I should be able to convert the video to fit the whole tv screen as the smart proxy feature produces low quality videos that fit the screen. However, I can't seem to output the video into a high quality format that will fill the screen. What setting in Videostudio can I change to solve the problem? Help!!!How do I alter the aspect ratio of my video file so that it plays full size on my TV using Ulead Videostudio?Why are you changing the resolution to a non-standard format - in VideoStudio (for a PAL country) you must ensure that you keep to the 720 x 576 size - you must also ensure that you project properties are set to 16:9 for a widescreen output and that you have not defaulted to 4:3 anywhere in the process.
..asian hair Parameter.Add()
..
Sony Bravia Aspect Ratio Stuck at 4:3?
Just bought a HD Motorola Starchoice Box, and have a Sony Bravia. I want to watch show's in better quality because there is pixelation that is more noticable then the last box had. It's brand new! And its an HD box...so how do I improve the quality of the picture? Im using an HDMI cable, How do I switch it to a better aspect ratio thats more fitting for better quality? The place that I noticed in the tv menu that says 4:3, I cant switch it. If this is making any sense..I just want to know how to improve the quality of the picture.
Is there any options that I can change that im missing? Is there somthing that I did wrong? Any Idea's or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.Sony Bravia Aspect Ratio Stuck at 4:3?You have to set the aspect ratio on your star choice box as well
Is there any options that I can change that im missing? Is there somthing that I did wrong? Any Idea's or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.Sony Bravia Aspect Ratio Stuck at 4:3?You have to set the aspect ratio on your star choice box as well
Aspect ratio on motorbike Tyre's?
The aspect ratio is the height of the tyres' sidewall, given as a percentage of the width of the tyre. So, for example, a 120/80-16 rear and a 100/80-16 front means the rear tyre is 96mm high and the front is 80mm high? But if you had a slightly wider rear wheel like a 130/80-16, then the rear would be 104mm high. In this example, how would the handling dynamics of the bike change.
Also, what if the front tyre had a different (i.e. higher or lower) aspect ratio to the rear wheel, regardless of the tyre widths - how would that affect handling characteristics?Aspect ratio on motorbike Tyre's?As long as the rim width is correct for that particular tire, extra width doesn't make a lot of dfference. That's why some of the 240 tires use a 5.5 inch rim, that's wider than a lot of cars.
If you use a tire that's too wide for the rim, the tire will take on a pyramid shape with a very narrow contact patch when upright. Tire wear will increase in the middle of the tire. When leaned over, you'll suddenly get a lot more tire contact, which might or might not be to your advantage.
If the rim is too wide, the tire will take on a shape like the top of a bread loaf, being rather flat in the middle. Like a worn rear tire, initiating a turn requires more effort to get the tire up onto the square shouder of the tire. You also have very little contact patch when leaned over and makes for squiggly handling.
The tire manufactuers have recommended widths or width ranges for each tire. That's what to go by because they know what shape the tire carcass is designed to have when inflated. The old Dunlop 71's (I think that's the right number) in the late 60's and early 70's had a very triangular shape. This gave very quick handling when upright and when leaned over, excellent contact. The British bikes used them and with the combination of their good frames, the higher horsepower Jap bikes couldn't keep up with the Brit bikes when they got into the curves.
As far as using different aspect ratios on either end of the bike, that probably isn't enough to make any difference in handling as long as the rim width is ok. A shorter tire up front is going to decrease the rake and trail slightly, which in theory would quicken handling but possibaly reduce straight line stability. In actuality, putting on the brakes and compressing the front springs is probably going to decrease rake and trail more than the extra 6 mm of height between a 120-80 and 120-90 for example. (The actual tire height difference is 12 mm, but the axle is only going to be 6 mm higher off the ground. A heavily loaded bike with the rear springs highly compressed will going to do the opposite, in theory.
A taller tire in theory is going to do the opposite by increasing the rake and trail. Now if you were going from a 16%26quot; to a 18%26quot;, 19%26quot; to 21%26quot; or vise versa, then that is certainly going to make some difference in handling. A taller rear tire is going to do the same thing as a shorter front tire and vise versa...but again, if you're just changing aspect ratios up or down one notch, it's so little that it probably won't make any difference.
If your bike's handling is too twitchy for your likes, a taller front and shorter rear tire might make enough difference to suit you. Too lazy and do the reverse. Just remember that just because tires from two different manufacturers have the same size stamped on the sidewall, that doesn't mean their actual size is equal. Again, check the manufacturers info, Dunlop is tops when it comes to providing actual tire width, actual tire height, recommended rim widths and usage. You'll find that there's a slight size difference between their own tire lines.Aspect ratio on motorbike Tyre's?In older times, tyre width was a dificulty, as occasionally still is. Vis: if the tyre is wide,and you are leaning over, the contact patch of the tyre with the road is a little off center towards the inside of the corner. If a significant bump occurs further inside the radius of the corner, and it becomes the new contact patch point, the alignment of the bike with the road is affected, such that the rate of turn changes tighter, lean, %26amp; increasing tyre adhesion stress and perhaps, on a shorter wheelbase %26amp; fat wheels, dislodging the rider with the jerk. Modern tyre compounds have eased the troubles a bit with better grip, but the physics remain true, and I sometimes worry when I see huge modern tyres. The Suzuki RV series were particularly bad, but even today's large bike riders need to be careful.Aspect ratio on motorbike Tyre's?the centre digits are % of the width measured rim to rim, not the tyre, this gives the height of the tyre from the base of the rim to the apex of the crown, unlike a car tyre where it is the wall depth. Thus by fitting a wider tyre you will increase the height of the tyre but without the reinforcment of the side wall. Therefore if the tyre is wider the tyre rides higher and the handling suffers.
If you kept the same size tyre but increased the rim width the trye would ride lower on the wheel and the sidewalls would be more stablized, thus there would be a mild increase in handling, but if you go to wide you will make the bike unhandleable in anything but a straight line.
It is better not to alter the width fitting of a tyre but only the aspect ratio of the tyre.Aspect ratio on motorbike Tyre's?I believe this may help, These are the three most common ways of sizing tyres, but keep in mind that there have been other ways of sizing tyres. (early tyres had both rim size and overall size, I believe that Coker still uses this on some Antique replacement tyres) EX 28X4.75X19
Also, what if the front tyre had a different (i.e. higher or lower) aspect ratio to the rear wheel, regardless of the tyre widths - how would that affect handling characteristics?Aspect ratio on motorbike Tyre's?As long as the rim width is correct for that particular tire, extra width doesn't make a lot of dfference. That's why some of the 240 tires use a 5.5 inch rim, that's wider than a lot of cars.
If you use a tire that's too wide for the rim, the tire will take on a pyramid shape with a very narrow contact patch when upright. Tire wear will increase in the middle of the tire. When leaned over, you'll suddenly get a lot more tire contact, which might or might not be to your advantage.
If the rim is too wide, the tire will take on a shape like the top of a bread loaf, being rather flat in the middle. Like a worn rear tire, initiating a turn requires more effort to get the tire up onto the square shouder of the tire. You also have very little contact patch when leaned over and makes for squiggly handling.
The tire manufactuers have recommended widths or width ranges for each tire. That's what to go by because they know what shape the tire carcass is designed to have when inflated. The old Dunlop 71's (I think that's the right number) in the late 60's and early 70's had a very triangular shape. This gave very quick handling when upright and when leaned over, excellent contact. The British bikes used them and with the combination of their good frames, the higher horsepower Jap bikes couldn't keep up with the Brit bikes when they got into the curves.
As far as using different aspect ratios on either end of the bike, that probably isn't enough to make any difference in handling as long as the rim width is ok. A shorter tire up front is going to decrease the rake and trail slightly, which in theory would quicken handling but possibaly reduce straight line stability. In actuality, putting on the brakes and compressing the front springs is probably going to decrease rake and trail more than the extra 6 mm of height between a 120-80 and 120-90 for example. (The actual tire height difference is 12 mm, but the axle is only going to be 6 mm higher off the ground. A heavily loaded bike with the rear springs highly compressed will going to do the opposite, in theory.
A taller tire in theory is going to do the opposite by increasing the rake and trail. Now if you were going from a 16%26quot; to a 18%26quot;, 19%26quot; to 21%26quot; or vise versa, then that is certainly going to make some difference in handling. A taller rear tire is going to do the same thing as a shorter front tire and vise versa...but again, if you're just changing aspect ratios up or down one notch, it's so little that it probably won't make any difference.
If your bike's handling is too twitchy for your likes, a taller front and shorter rear tire might make enough difference to suit you. Too lazy and do the reverse. Just remember that just because tires from two different manufacturers have the same size stamped on the sidewall, that doesn't mean their actual size is equal. Again, check the manufacturers info, Dunlop is tops when it comes to providing actual tire width, actual tire height, recommended rim widths and usage. You'll find that there's a slight size difference between their own tire lines.Aspect ratio on motorbike Tyre's?In older times, tyre width was a dificulty, as occasionally still is. Vis: if the tyre is wide,and you are leaning over, the contact patch of the tyre with the road is a little off center towards the inside of the corner. If a significant bump occurs further inside the radius of the corner, and it becomes the new contact patch point, the alignment of the bike with the road is affected, such that the rate of turn changes tighter, lean, %26amp; increasing tyre adhesion stress and perhaps, on a shorter wheelbase %26amp; fat wheels, dislodging the rider with the jerk. Modern tyre compounds have eased the troubles a bit with better grip, but the physics remain true, and I sometimes worry when I see huge modern tyres. The Suzuki RV series were particularly bad, but even today's large bike riders need to be careful.Aspect ratio on motorbike Tyre's?the centre digits are % of the width measured rim to rim, not the tyre, this gives the height of the tyre from the base of the rim to the apex of the crown, unlike a car tyre where it is the wall depth. Thus by fitting a wider tyre you will increase the height of the tyre but without the reinforcment of the side wall. Therefore if the tyre is wider the tyre rides higher and the handling suffers.
If you kept the same size tyre but increased the rim width the trye would ride lower on the wheel and the sidewalls would be more stablized, thus there would be a mild increase in handling, but if you go to wide you will make the bike unhandleable in anything but a straight line.
It is better not to alter the width fitting of a tyre but only the aspect ratio of the tyre.Aspect ratio on motorbike Tyre's?I believe this may help, These are the three most common ways of sizing tyres, but keep in mind that there have been other ways of sizing tyres. (early tyres had both rim size and overall size, I believe that Coker still uses this on some Antique replacement tyres) EX 28X4.75X19
Why does my converter change the movie from widescreen to an unusuall fullscreen?
I have been using isquint to convert .avi to .mp4, but with the last movie, it converted it, but it squezed it down to a full screen instead of the widescreen aspect ratio i wanted. How can i get it to convert without changing it?Why does my converter change the movie from widescreen to an unusuall fullscreen?It sounds like it's trying to convert it to full-screen size for an ipod. Try looking around in the settings, and see if there's an option somewhere to convert to widescreen instead of fullscreen.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(Atom)